I was given an exploratory question, during the allotted time, regarding interacting criteria, and I answered fast for “yes to younger” because of two reasons. 1.) That was the easiest way to instantly provide the perfect example, in three words. There was no need to explain; the listener had all the reference, a self. 2.) And being bold & confident is easy when an adrenaline spike builds and releases. Wasn’t planned. Just thrilling to embrace the impromptu opportunity to be borderline inappropriate.
And if the three words are now completely forgotten. Relief. I’m safe from possible reprimand or the need for “we can talk about this any time.” I really don’t think there needs to be a talk. A targeted owner can be assured that they are safe. Sometimes three words, innocent or not, can just be ignored. It was merely three words granting three seconds of satisfaction for the speaker. But that’s not correct. The memory is even good for occasional revisits for many hours later. Funny how being told to go forth with confidence can pull out the perfect test case.
But I waver. Practicing being confident, after the event, can quickly lead to self doubt. I’ve been told that these kind of recipients in their special space can easily deflect.
And the second question about interacting criteria didn’t get a proper reply. I was being flippant. The general answer is “yes to older.” Why was the question even asked? No point in the number. Everything that made that number is root criteria.
Leave a Reply